Battle after breast cancer
8/10/2008
They've lost their breasts, but not their voices. JANINE RANKIN
spoke to a handful of the estimated hundreds of breast cancer
survivors who feel cheated that the promise of a breast
reconstruction following life-saving mastectomies has been
broken.
Lorraine Green hates bathrooms with big mirrors.
Shopping for clothes reduces her to tears.
The Palmerston North woman wants to celebrate her sister-in-law
Shirl Strom's good fortune in attracting an anonymous donor, who
paid for her breast reconstruction in private.
But to see her showing a hint of cleavage is bittersweet.
Hers is a lop-sided image that she just can't bear, and she
doesn't like having to talk about it either.
"I know I'm not the only one in this boat.
"After all you go through to get here, to have to bare your soul
to whoever, to get what should be yours, the completion of the
original surgery, is just too much."
Mrs Green is a two-time breast cancer survivor.
The first time, 12 years ago, aged 42, the wife and mother had a
lump taken from the left breast.
But two years ago, the disease was back, in her right breast,
eventually leading to a full mastectomy.
Facing a course of chemotherapy and radiotherapy to follow, and
not wanting to delay, she wasn't a good candidate to have
reconstruction undertaken at the same time.
The prospect of change in public hospital waiting lists for
surgery, including post-cancer treatment breast reconstruction, was
in the wind, but she believed she was on a promise.
"When I had the surgery, the focus was on treatment, not on the
lost breast.
"I didn't think it would bother me.
"I know some other women have gone through a mastectomy and been
fine about it.
"It was only when I finished the treatment that it really hit
home."
Her referral to Hutt Hospital, which provides plastic surgery
services for the lower North and upper South Islands, was made at
her insistence and without much optimism.
As expected, her case was returned to her GP, with the standard,
but in this case rather inappropriate advice, that if her condition
got worse, she could be re-referred.
The Hutt Valley District Health Board has little other choice -
it hasn't got enough theatres and staff to meet the demand for
reconstructive surgery.
It has four new theatres on the building list for 2011, and is
trying to get two theatres complete and staffed by October next
year.
Meantime, Health Ministry rule changes made in 2006, means it
can't put people on a waiting list unless it knows it can deliver
the promised surgery within six months.
In the past two years, it hasn't carried out any delayed
reconstructions at all.
Within the past few weeks, it has met other boards, including
MidCentral Health, asking if those boards could step up their
volumes of minor surgery to free up more capacity at Hutt for more
complex cases from around the region.
MidCentral Health said it had no more capacity in its theatres
to help.
The others, except Whanganui, made the same reply.
That means the only women who get new breasts through the public
health system are those who have the rebuild included in their
original cancer treatment surgery.
Some of them don't even have cancer yet.
The ability to genetically predict women at very high risk of
developing breast cancer has created an increasing demand for well
women to have their breasts off and new ones created.
"Certainly, genetic testing and women wanting prophylactic
mastectomy is exacerbating the situation," says Hutt Hospital
service manager for plastics, Carolyn Braddock.
Which leaves Mrs Green feeling less than whole, dependent on
prosthetics to help her present a balanced front to the world,
unwilling to wear tops with even a slight v-neck, when the shops
are full of cleavage-displaying fashion, and with little hope that
things will change.
"I'm at the stage now, if I can't get a reconstruction I would
rather have the other breast removed."
Meantime, she would never be seen in public without a
prosthesis.
All women who have breast cancer surgery qualify for a subsidy
to cover the cost of a prosthesis and bra.
It's worth $600 the first time, with an additional $400 every
four years after that.
It's a choice that satisfies many of the 100 women in the
district that are diagnosed with breast cancer each year.
All of these women qualify for a prosthetics subsidy.
Around half have breast- preserving surgery, while the other
half have a mastectomy.
Like many other women, Mrs Green has knocked on MP's doors and
rattled whatever cages she can.
For the moment though, she's waiting for the outcome of a
MidCentral District Health Board suggestion to try a referral to
Hamilton.
The situation there isn't quite as despairing.
One of the original campaigners for the rights of women awaiting
a breast reconstruction finally had her surgery done up there late
last year.
Formerly from Ashhurst, Raewyn Calvert had been waiting 22
months for a reconstruction, when 30,000 people were culled from
waiting lists.
Her outrage was the catalyst for Black Pearls, a calendar of
women who'd lost breasts, which was presented to MPs at the end of
2006.
She says the surgery was a big deal.
And it is major surgery - taking hours of theatre time and weeks
of quite difficult recovery.
But it was worth it, she says.
She feels whole, she feels womanly again, and she has regained
some of her self- confidence.
It's the outcome she wants for other women who feel the same
way.